- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-21/15: Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2016 — Franmax v EUIPO — Ehrmann (Dino) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Dino — Earlier EU figurative trade mark representing a dinosaur — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0021
62015TA0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.6.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 211/48
(Case T-21/15) (*)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative trade mark Dino - Earlier EU figurative trade mark representing a dinosaur - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 211/60)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Franmax UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: E. Saukalas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Uriarte Valiente, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu (Oberschönegg, Germany) (represented by: A. Gaul, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2014 (Case R 2012/2013-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu and Franmax UAB.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action.
2.Orders Franmax UAB to pay the costs.
(*)
OJ 2015 C 107, 30.3.2015, p. 32.