- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-355/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 7 June 2021 — Procter & Gamble International Operations SA v Perfumesco.pl sp. z o.o., sp. k.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0355
62021CN0355
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.9.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 357/8
(Case C-355/21)
(2021/C 357/10)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Procter & Gamble International Operations SA
Defendant: Perfumesco.pl sp. z o.o., sp. k.
Question referred
Must Article 10 of Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (1) be interpreted as precluding the interpretation of a provision of national law to the effect that a protection measure in the form of destruction of goods relates only to goods illegally manufactured or illegally marked, and cannot be applied to goods illegally put on the market in the territory of the European Economic Area which cannot be found to have been illegally manufactured or illegally marked?
(1) Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45, Special edition in Polish: Chapter 17 Volume 002 P. 32 — 39).