- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2007. # Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Procedure - Application for revision - Application concerning an order made under Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Conditions - Appeals - New fact - Inadmissibility. # Case C-12/05 P-REV.
ECLI:EU:C:2007:720
62005CJ0012
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-12/05 P-REV)
Procedure – Application for revision – Application concerning an order made under Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure – Conditions – Appeals – New fact – Inadmissibility
Procedure – Revision of a judgment – Conditions for the admissibility thereof – New fact – Meaning – Fact known before delivery of the judgment – Not included – Inadmissible (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 44) (see paras 15-18)
Re:
Application of revision concerning the Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 in Case C-12/05 P.
Operative part
The application for revision brought by Mr Meister is dismissed as inadmissible;
Mr Meister and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) are each ordered to bear their own costs.