EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-610/23: Action brought on 3 October 2023 — Hamster Polska v EUIPO — Budotechnika (Outdoor toilets, Public toilets)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0610

62023TN0610

October 3, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/779

(Case T-610/23)

(C/2023/779)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Hamster Polska sp. z o.o. (Rybnik, Poland) (represented by: A. Szczurek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Budotechnika sp. z o.o. (Pilchowice, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design for Outdoor toilets, Public toilets — Community design No 1 653 676-0004

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2023 in Case R 15/2023-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision or amend it by rejecting the right to the contested design 1 653 676 0004;

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

order the intervener to bear its own costs of participating in the proceedings before EUIPO and the General Court of the European Union.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 8(1), 53(1) and 63 of Regulation No 6/2002;

Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1), 5(2), 6, 7(1) and 53(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;

Infringement of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia