I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
(Case T-610/23)
(C/2023/779)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: Hamster Polska sp. z o.o. (Rybnik, Poland) (represented by: A. Szczurek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Budotechnika sp. z o.o. (Pilchowice, Poland)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design for Outdoor toilets, Public toilets — Community design No 1 653 676-0004
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2023 in Case R 15/2023-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision or amend it by rejecting the right to the contested design 1 653 676 0004;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;
—order the intervener to bear its own costs of participating in the proceedings before EUIPO and the General Court of the European Union.
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 8(1), 53(1) and 63 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1), 5(2), 6, 7(1) and 53(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.