EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-872/16: Action brought on 9 December 2016 — repowermap v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0872

62016TN0872

December 9, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

30.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/58

(Case T-872/16)

(2017/C 030/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: repowermap.org (Bern, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Repower AG (Brusio, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union word mark ‘REPOWER’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 020 351

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Second decision (after revocation) of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2016 in Case R 2311/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

alter the contested decision by declaring the mark at issue invalid in respect of all the goods and services not cancelled by the contested decision, with the exception of packaging and storage of goods (Class 39), arrangement of travel (Class 39) and fire extinguishers (Class 9);

order EUIPO and Repower AG to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 in relation with Article 296 TFEU.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia