- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-397/15: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2016 — PAL-Bullermann v EUIPO — Symaga (PAL) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark PAL — Partial revocation — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing from the registered mark — Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0397
62015TA0397
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 30/44
(Case T-397/15)(1)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark PAL - Partial revocation - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing from the registered mark - Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))
(2017/C 030/48)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: PAL-Bullermann GmbH (Friesoythe-Markhausen, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Symaga, SA (Villarta de San Juan, Spain) (represented by: A. Tarí Lázaro, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 May 2015 (Case R 1626/2014-1) relating to revocation proceedings between PAL-Bullermann and Symaga.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders PAL-Bullermann GmbH to pay the costs.
OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.