EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-46/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2021 — Council of the European Union v Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), European Commission, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy — Combating terrorism — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Article 1(3), (4) and (6) — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Conditions — Decision by a competent authority — Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Decision to review the national decision on which the initial inclusion was based — Obligation to state reasons)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0046

62019CA0046

April 22, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.6.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/3

(Case C-46/19 P) (*)

(Appeal - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Combating terrorism - Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities - Freezing of funds - Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Article 1(3), (4) and (6) - Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 - Article 2(3) - Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts - Conditions - Decision by a competent authority - Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Decision to review the national decision on which the initial inclusion was based - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 228/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) (represented by: A.M. van Eik and T.M.D. Buruma, advocaten), European Commission (represented by: R. Tricot, T. Ramopoulos and J. Norris, acting as Agents), and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented: initially by S. Brandon, acting as Agent, and by P. Nevill, Barrister, and subsequently by F. Shibli and S. McCrory, acting as Agents, and by P. Nevill, Barrister)

Interveners in support of the appellant: French Republic (represented by: A.L. Desjonquères, B. Fodda and J.-L. Carré, acting as Agents) and Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M.K. Bulterman and J. Langer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside points 1 to 11, 13 and 14 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 November 2018, PKK v Council (T-316/14, EU:T:2018:788);

2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

3.Reserves the costs.

(*)

Language of the case: English

ECLI:EU:C:2021:140

* * *

(*) Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia