- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-209/19: Action brought on 5 April 2019 — Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0209
62019TN0209
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.5.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 182/38
(Case T-209/19)
(2019/C 182/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Giorgio Armani SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: J. Rether and M. Kinkeldey, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Invicta Watch Company of America, Inc. (Hollywood, Florida, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark in colours black and white — Application for registration No 15 910 301
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 in Case R 578/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.