I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-402/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Freude an Farbe - Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2020/C 399/47)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Brillux GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Synthesa Chemie GesmbH (Perg, Austria) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2019 (Case R 1434/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Synthesa Chemie and Brillux.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Brillux GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.