- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-371/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 1 August 2014 — APEX GmbH Internationale Spedition v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0371
62014CN0371
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 372/3
(Case C-371/14)
2014/C 372/05
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: APEX GmbH Internationale Spedition
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
Questions referred
1.Is Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 260/2013 of 18 March 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 on imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, whether declared as originating in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam or not (OJ 2013 L 82 of 22.3.2013, pp. 10-17; ‘Regulation No 260/2013’) invalid because the anti-dumping duty introduced by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007, and which was to be extended, was no longer in force at the time when Regulation No 260/2013 was adopted? If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:
2.Is Regulation No 260/2013 invalid because there is no evidence of circumvention, within the meaning of Article 13(1) of Regulation No [1225/2009], of the measure imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007?
Language of the case: German
* * *
(1) OJ 2013 L 82, p. 10.
(2) OJ 2007 L 326, p. 1.