(Case C‑26/10 P)

Appeal – Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure – Application seeking to have the Commission bring infringement proceedings – Application for directions addressed to the Commission – Adoption of measures intended to ensure equal treatment for handicapped persons in the sphere of employment – Clear inadmissibility of the appeal

Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1); Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(1)(c)) (see paras 7-11)

Re:

Appeal lodged against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2009 in Case T‑295/09 Hansen v Commission, by which that court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible an action seeking a declaration of failure to act by the Commission in that the latter had failed to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC against the Kingdom of Sweden, and seeking an order that the Commission exercise its right of initiative, adopt measures and support initiatives intended to promote the right of handicapped persons to equal treatment and non-discrimination in their professional lives.

Operative part:

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Mr Hansen to bear his own costs.