- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-648/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Super bock group v EUIPO — Agus (Crystal) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Crystal — Earlier national word mark CRISTAL — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0648
62018TA0648
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.2.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 36/27
(Case T-648/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Crystal - Earlier national word mark CRISTAL - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the goods - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 36/32)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Super bock group, SGPS SA (Leça do Balio, Portugal) (represented by: J.P. Mioludo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Agus sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 July 2018 (Case R 299/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Unicer-Bebidas de Portugal, SGPS SA and Agus.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Super bock group, SGPS SA to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2020036EN.01002701-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2020036EN.01002701-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.