- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-393/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2011 — NEC Display Solutions Europe GmbH v OHIM — Nokia (NaViKey) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NaViKey — Earlier Community word mark NAVI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Breach of the duty to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0393
62009TA0393
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 347/28
(Case T-393/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark NaViKey - Earlier Community word mark NAVI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Breach of the duty to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
2011/C 347/43
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: NEC Display Solutions Europe GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: P. Munzinger, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Nokia Corp. (Espoo, Finland) (represented by J. Tanhuanpää, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 June 2009 (Case R 1143/2008-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Nokia Corp. and NEC Display Solutions Europe GMbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders NEC Display Solutions Europe GmbH to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.