I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 372/38)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Registration of the European Union word mark ‘SOS Loch- und Rissfüller’ — Application for registration No 17 870 692
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2019 in Case R 278/2019-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the Decision of EUIPO of 7 January 2019 in so far as it rejects the application for registration of the mark ‘SOS Loch- und Rissfüller’ in respect of the following goods:
—‘Class 1 — Chemicals used in industry; Masonry preservatives and dampers, roof tiles, cements and concrete, except paints and oils; Synthetic resins, synthetic resins and unprocessed plastics; Solvents (chemical -); Fillers for use in coating paints (not included in other classes)
—Class 2 — Raw natural resins
—Class 19 — Mortar for building construction; Quartz; Coatings (building materials); Cleaning preparations; Compositions for building devices; Filaments being building materials; Fabrics for building purposes, not of metal or predominantly non-metallic materials, in particular stabilising fabric’;
—order EUIPO to allow the application for registration to be published, as lodged;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 2017/1001.