EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered on 6 March 1997. # Commission of the European Communities v French Republic. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 93/38/EEC - Failure to transpose within the prescribeb period. # Case C-311/96.

ECLI:EU:C:1997:116

61996CC0311

March 6, 1997
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61996C0311

European Court reports 1997 Page I-02939

Opinion of the Advocate-General

1 In these proceedings, the Commission alleges that the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors, (1) and in particular Article 45, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement the directive. In the alternative, the Commission seeks a declaration that the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the above provisions by not immediately informing the Commission of such measures.

2 Article 45 requires Member States to adopt the measures necessary to transpose the directive, apply them by 1 July 1994 (2) and inform the Commission thereof immediately.

3 The French Republic does not deny that it has not transposed the directive within the prescribed period. It merely states that the relevant draft legislation has been entered on the parliamentary agenda for the year 1996/97.

4 As it is clear, therefore, that the directive in question has not been transposed within the prescribed period, there is no need to examine the Commission's alternative plea.

5 I therefore propose that the Court declare that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive and in particular under Article 45 thereof. I also propose that the French Republic be ordered to pay the costs.

(1) - OJ 1993 L 199, p. 84.

(2) - Under Article 45(2), however, other periods apply to Spain, Portugal and Greece.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia