I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 7/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Canalones Castilla, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: F. J. Serrano Irurzun, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Canalones Novokanal, SL (Madrid, Spain)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: Community design (Water-collection guttering; waterspouts) — Community design No 363 486-0001
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 April 2022 in Case R 1122/2021-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—if the applicant’s claims are rejected in their entirety, order, in ruling as to costs in the decision closing the proceedings, that the other parties must bear their own costs.
—The prior disclosure of the design submitted by the invalidity applicant has not been sufficiently established.
—In the alternative, the design submitted by the invalidity applicant as a prior design does not produce the same overall impression as the design at issue.
—In the alternative, the disclosure was abusive due to infringement of copyright.