- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 February 2006.#Giorgio Lebedef v Commission of the European Communities.#Appeal - Officials - Rules on the levels, body, and procedures of consultation agreed between the majority of trade unions and staff associations and the Commission - Exclusion of the union "Action et Défense" - Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-268/05 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2006:86
62005CO0268
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C 268/05 P)
Appeal – Officials – Rules concerning the levels, process and procedure of consultation agreed by the majority of trade union and professional organisations and the Commission – Exclusion of the ‘Action & Défense’ union – Manifestly inadmissible
Appeals – Grounds of appeal – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Inadmissible (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 13-15)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment delivered on 12 April 2005 by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) in Case T-191/02 Lebedef v Commission, by which it dismissed an application for annulment of the Commission’s decision by which it repudiated the Framework Agreement of 20 September 1974 on the relations between the Commission and the trade union and professional organisations, adopted again the operational rules concerning the levels, process and procedure of consultation agreed by the Commission and the majority of trade union and professional organisations on 19 January 2000, which had been annulled by the Court of First Instance in its judgment of 15 November 2001, in so far as they excluded from the process of consultation the union ‘Action et Défense’
Operative part:
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Lebedef to pay the costs.