EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-541/15: Action brought on 17 September 2015 — Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane v OHIM — Audi (NSU)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0541

62015TN0541

September 17, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/51

(Case T-541/15)

(2015/C 381/62)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane Srl (Reggio Emilia, Italy) (represented by: M. Gurrado, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Audi AG (Ingolstadt, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘NSU’ — Application for registration No 9 593 492

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 July 2015 in Case R 2132/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and, as a result, the OHIM shall proceed with the registration of the application for CTM;

order AUDI to bear its own costs and pay those of the Applicant, also for the proceedings before the OHIM Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Audi failed to demonstrate genuine use of the earlier mark;

Existence of a difference between components and finished products;

Existence of a difference between bicycles and the goods indicated in the request of limitation dated 16 October 2014.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia