EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-565/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Armando Carvalho and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Appeal — Action for annulment and for damages — Environment — 2030 climate and energy package — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Lack of individual concern)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0565

62019CA0565

March 25, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.5.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/11

(Case C-565/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Action for annulment and for damages - Environment - 2030 climate and energy package - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Lack of individual concern)

(2021/C 206/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Armando Carvalho, Diogo Carvalho, Ildebrando Conceição, Alfredo Sendim, Joaquim Caxeiro, Renaud Feschet, Guylaine Feschet, Gabriel Feschet, Maurice Feschet, Geneviève Gassin, Roba Waku Guya, Fadhe Hussein Tache, Sado Guyo, Issa Guyo, Jibril Guyo, Adanoor Guyo, Mohammed Guyo, Petru Vlad, Ana Tricu, Petru Arin Vlad, Maria Ioana Vlad, Andrei Nicolae Vlad, Giorgio Davide Elter, Sara Burland, Soulail Elter, Alice Elter, Rosa Elter, Maria Elter, Maike Recktenwald, Michael Recktenwald, Lueke Recktenwald, Petero Qaloibau, Melania Cironiceva, Katarina Dimoto, Petero Jnr Qaloibau, Elisabeta Tokalau and Sáminuorra (represented by: G. Winter, Professor, H. Leith, Barrister, and by R. Verheyen, Rechtsanwältin)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Peternel, C. Ionescu Dima and A. Tamás, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: European Commission (represented by: A.C. Becker and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Mr Armando Carvalho and 36 other appellants whose names are set out in the annex to the present judgment to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union;

3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia