- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-36/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Bischoff v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Compulsory retirement — Article 23(1) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Retirement age — Refusal to extend the period of activity — Second paragraph of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0036
62014FA0036
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.6.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/43
(Case F-36/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil service - Officials - Compulsory retirement - Article 23(1) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Retirement age - Refusal to extend the period of activity - Second paragraph of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations - Interest of the service))
(2015/C 213/70)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Hartwig Bischoff (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application to annul the Commission’s decisions rejecting, first, the application to extend the applicant’s service and, second, confirming the applicant’s compulsory retirement on 1 June 2014.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1)Dismisses the action;
2)Declares that Mr Bischoff is to bear all of his own costs and all of the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 292, 1/9/2014, p. 60.
Language of the case: French