- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-677/17: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2019 — ClientEarth v Commission (Action for annulment — Internal market — Environment — Regulation (EU) 2017/1154 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0677
62017TB0677
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.12.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 423/51
(Case T-677/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Internal market - Environment - Regulation (EU) 2017/1154 - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 423/65)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Jones, Barrister)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Becker, G. Gattinara and M. Huttunen, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1154 of 7 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1230/2012 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards real-driving emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) (OJ 2017 L 175, p. 708).
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 392, 20.11.2017.