I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-324/15)(1)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark BAG PAX - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2016/C 260/50)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Sander, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, formerly BAGPAX Cargo Systems e.K.: Marvin Dominic Andrã (Saarlouis, Germany) (represented by: T. Dohmen, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 April 2015 (Case R 1971/2014-4) concerning revocation proceedings between Volkswagen and BAGPAX Cargo Systems.
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Volkswagen AG shall pay the costs.
OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.
* Language of the case: German.