- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-375/21: Order of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO — Schafft (Representation of a geometric figure) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0375
62021TB0375
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 266/28
(Case T-375/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 266/34)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Lüft, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Thomas Schafft (Munich, Germany) (represented by: V. Sandulache, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2021 (Joined Cases R 1931/2018-2 and R 1936/2018-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Thomas Schafft and Leinfelder Uhren München.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Thomas Schafft shall bear the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.