- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2012.#Universal Corp. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Request that the parent company pay the fine — Bank guarantee lodged in the name of the subsidiary — Date on which the fine becomes due for payment — Action for annulment — Measure not open to challenge — Inadmissibility.#Case T‑42/11.
ECLI:EU:T:2012:122
62011TO0042
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T‑42/11)
3. Union law — Principles — Right to effective judicial protection — Action for annulment against measures not producing binding legal effects inadmissible — Possibility of parties challenging such measures by an action in non-contractual liability of the Union (Arts 268 TFEU, 299, fourth para., TFEU and 340, second para., TFEU) (see paras 43-45)
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letters of 12 and 30 November 2010 in which the Commission requested the applicant to pay the amount of the fine that had been imposed on it, jointly and severally with its subsidiary Deltafina SpA, by Commission Decision C(2005) 4012 final of 20 October 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.281/B2 — Raw Tobacco — Italy).
Operative part
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.