- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-435/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2015 — GROFA GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0435
62015CN0435
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 363/22
(Case C-435/15)
(2015/C 363/28)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: GROFA GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover
Questions referred
(a) Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1249/2011 of 29 November 2011 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature applicable by analogy to the products which are the subject of the main proceedings (GoPro HERO3 ‘Black Edition’, ‘Black Edition Surf’, and ‘Black Edition Motorsport’)?
(b) If the answer to that question is in the affirmative: Is Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1249/2011 valid?
If the answer to question 1(a) or 1(b) is in the negative:
(a) Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 of 8 August 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature applicable by analogy to the products which are the subject of the main proceedings?
(b) If the answer to that question is in the affirmative: Is Implementation Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 valid?
If the answer to question 1(a) or 1(b) is in the negative: Are the Commission’s Explanatory Notes to subheadings 8525 80 91 and 8525 80 99 of the Combined Nomenclature to be interpreted as meaning that a sequence of video recorded in separate files each having a duration of less than 30 minutes is a recording of ‘at least 30 minutes in a single sequence of video’ if, when the recording is played, the viewer cannot perceive the switch between different files?
If the answer to question 1(a) or 1(b) is in the negative, and the answer to questions 2(a), 2(b) and 3 is in the affirmative: Does the fact that video camera recorders which are able to record signals from external sources are not able to reproduce those signals on an external television receiver or an external monitor preclude their being classified under subparagraph 8525 80 99 CN?
Language of the case: German
(1) 2011 OJ L 319, p. 39.
(2) 2014 OJ L 240, p. 12.
(3) 2015 OJ C 76, p. 1.