- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-750/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024 – Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB) (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Tasks of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 6(5)(b) – Supervision of a credit institution directly by the ECB – Conditions – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0750
62021CA0750
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2273
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024 — Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB)
(Case C-750/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Tasks of the European Central Bank (ECB) - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Article 6(5)(b) - Supervision of a credit institution directly by the ECB - Conditions - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Representation of a party - Authority to act granted to the lawyer - Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act)
(C/2024/2273)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Pilatus Bank plc (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou, M. Puidokas and E. Yoo, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 24 September 2021, Pilatus Bank v ECB (T-139/19, EU:T:2021:623);
2.Dismisses the action brought in Case T-139/19 as inadmissible;
3.Orders Pilatus Bank plc to pay the costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2273/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
—
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15