- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-83/22: Action brought on 14 February 2022 — Selimfiber v EUIPO — Qureshi (SPETRA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0083
62022TN0083
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/38
(Case T-83/22)
(2022/C 148/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Selimfiber Co. Ltd (Gimpo-si, Republic of Korea) (represented by: J. Klaus and M. Odink, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mohammad Sohail Qureshi (Bradford, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SPETRA — Application for registration No 18 271 624
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 November 2021 in Case R 684/2021-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of and occasioned by this application and other incurred costs; alternatively if the other party before the EUIPO intervenes, hold it and the defendant jointly and severally liable for those costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.