- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-45/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 4 April 2011 — AO v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary measure — Removal from post — Article 35(1)(d) and (2)(a) of the Rules of Procedure — Action, in part, clearly inadmissible and, in part, clearly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010FB0045
62010FB0045
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.5.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 160/28
(Case F-45/10)(1)
(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary measure - Removal from post - Article 35(1)(d) and (2)(a) of the Rules of Procedure - Action, in part, clearly inadmissible and, in part, clearly unfounded)
2011/C 160/44
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AO (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Schober, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application, first, for annulment of decision CMS 07/046 of the Commission ordering the removal of the applicant from his post without reduction to his entitlement to a retirement pension with effect from 15 August 2009 and to annul all the decisions taken against the applicant between the period from September 2003 until his removal from his post and, second, for damages.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being, in part, clearly inadmissible and, in part, clearly unfounded.
2.The applicant shall pay all the costs.
OJ C 221, 14.8.2010, p. 60.