EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-93/24: Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Lantmännen and Lantmännen Biorefineries v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0093

62024TN0093

February 19, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2333

(Case T-93/24)

(C/2024/2333)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Lantmännen ek för (Stockholm, Sweden), Lantmännen Biorefineries AB (Norrköping, Sweden) (represented by: R. Bachour, A. Van Cauwelaert, S. Perván Lindeborg and M. Nicolin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul, in whole or in part, the decision in case AT.40054 — Ethanol Benchmarks — C(2023) 8320 final, adopted by the Commission on 7 December 2023 and addressed to Lantmännen ek för and Lantmännen Biorefineries AB.

order that the Commission pays the costs of the proceedings, including those of any potential interveners.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission has failed to respect the principle of the presumption of innocence in relation to the applicants by the adoption of the Commission Decision of 10 December 2021, C(2021) 8913 (the ‘Settlement Decision’) and by the references to the applicants in that decision.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission has violated the applicants’ right to good administration, including the rights to impartiality and of defence, by not ensuring that any reasonable doubts could be excluded as to the Commission’s impartiality in examining the applicants’ case, following the adoption of the Settlement Decision.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2333/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia