- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-566/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 14 September 2021 — AA v Banca S
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0566
62021CN0566
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.1.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 2/20
(Case C-566/21)
(2022/C 2/25)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant and defendant at first instance: S
Respondent and applicant at first instance: AA
Question referred
Does Article 6(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (1) as interpreted in the case-law of the Court of Justice, allow a term to be altered in such a way that the purely potestative right of the seller or supplier to convert the currency of the credit agreement in fact constitutes an obligation on the seller or supplier if that alteration is entirely to the benefit of the consumer and the mere removal of the unfair term from the agreement is of no benefit to him or her?
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
* * *
Language of the case: Romanian