I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-466/14) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Customs Union - Importation of tuna products from El Salvador - Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties - Application for non-recovery of import duties - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 236 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Right to good administration under Article 872a of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Error of the competent authorities not reasonably capable of being detected))
(2017/C 038/32)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by A. Rubio González, and subsequently by V. Ester Casas, abogados del Estado)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Arenas, A. Caeiros and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)
Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2363 final of 14 April 2014 which found, in a particular case, that the remission of import duties is justified for a certain amount, but not for another amount (REM 02/2013), inasmuch as it concludes that the remission of the import duties of EUR 14 417 193,41 is not justified.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017038EN.01002402-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017038EN.01002402-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.