- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-154/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Granada (Spain) lodged on 1 April 2015 — Francisco Gutiérrez Naranjo v BBK Bank Cajasur, S.A.U.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0154
62015CN0154
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.7.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 228/3
(Case C-154/15)
(2015/C 228/03)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Francisco Gutiérrez Naranjo
Defendant: BBK Bank Cajasur, S.A.U.
Questions referred
1)In such cases, is an interpretation according to which an unfair term declared void nonetheless produces effects until that declaration is made compatible with the interpretation of ‘non-binding’ in Article 6(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC? Therefore, even though the term has been declared void, will the effects produced by that term while it was in force be considered not to be invalidated or ineffective?
2)Is an injunction that may be issued to desist from using a particular term (in accordance with Articles 6(1) and 7(1)) in an individual action brought by a consumer when such a declaration is made compatible with a limitation of the effects of a declaration of nullity? May (the courts) alter the reimbursement of any sums paid by the consumer — which the seller or supplier is obliged to reimburse — under the term subsequently declared void ex tunc, for want of information and/or of transparency?
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts. OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.