EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-16/24: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – IServ v EUIPO – Jordanova and Others (IServ) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark IServ – Earlier national word mark Info Serv – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal authenticity of translations – Article 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0016

62024TA0016

November 13, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/184

(Case T-16/24)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark IServ - Earlier national word mark Info Serv - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Legal authenticity of translations - Article 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626)

(C/2025/184)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: IServ GmbH (Brunswick, Germany) (represented by: M. Wille, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Victoria Dorovska (Sofia, Bulgaria), Stefan Jordanov (Ruse, Bulgaria), Nadja Jordanova (Ruse)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 November 2023 (Case R 1557/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

Language of the case: English.

(1) OJ C C/2024/1558, 26.2.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/184/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/184/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia