I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2025/1630)
Language of the case: German
Applicants at first instance and appellants in the Revision (appeal on a point of law): GT, Beteiligungen im Baltikum AG, VCI Venture Capital und Immobilien AG
Defendant at first instance and respondent in the Revision (appeal on a point of law): Valora Effekten Handel AG
Is sub-paragraph 4(iii) of Article 3(1a) of Directive 2004/109/EC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) to be interpreted as precluding the second example of the first paragraph of Paragraph 34(2) of the Wertpapierhandelsgesetz (German Law on Securities Trading, ‘the WpHG’), according to which, in order to attribute voting rights, it is not necessary that the person subject to the reporting obligation and the third party have entered into an agreement on the exercise of voting rights, but rather it is sufficient for factual circumstances to reveal the existence of concerted action in another way?
—
Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC (OJ 2004 L 390, p. 38).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1630/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—