- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-40/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 25 January 2016 — Irene Uhden v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines N.V.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0040
62016CN0040
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.5.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 175/5
(Case C-40/16)
(2016/C 175/03)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Irene Uhden
Defendant: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines N.V.
Question referred
Is the second sentence of Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (‘the air passenger rights regulation’) to be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘distance’ relates only to the direct distance between the point of departure and the last destination, regardless of the distance actually flown in the individual case?
(1) OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
* * *
Language of the case: German.