- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-166/24: Action brought on 22 March 2024 – Ben Ali v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0166
62024TN0166
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4089
8.7.2024
(Case T-166/24)
(C/2024/4089)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Nesrine Ben Ali (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi and M. Hazguer, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare admissible Ms Nesrine Ben Ali’s requests in respect of the present application;
—annul the annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP of 31 January 2011 concerning restrictive measures to the extent that it concerns Ms Nesrine Ben Ali (file No 6), in so far as that annex was extended by Council Decision 2023/159 of 19 January 2024, and the effects thereof;
—order the Council to pay Ms Nesrine Ben Ali EUR 20 000 to cover the payment of her legal costs;
—order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a failure to fulfil the obligation to state reasons.
3.Third plea in law, based on the right to effective judicial protection.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4089/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—