Official Journal of the European Union

C series

—

C/2025/535

3.2.2025

(Case C-802/24, Reibel)

(C/2025/535)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NV Reibel

Defendant: JSC VO Stankoimport

Questions referred

1.Must Regulation 833/2014 (1) be interpreted as meaning that parties to an agreement are precluded from reaching an agreement out of court on claims which, under Article 11(1) of that regulation, are not to be satisfied and that amicable settlements reached by parties to an agreement on claims covered by Article 11(1) are null and void in civil law?

2.Must Article 11 of Regulation 833/2014 be interpreted as meaning that a national court hearing an application for setting aside or annulment of an arbitration award in which that article has been applied must determine of its own motion whether the arbitration tribunal’s application of the law is compatible with Regulation 833/2014 and, in such a case, must the national court annul or set aside the arbitration award in whole or in part if the arbitration tribunal’s application of the law was contrary to the regulation?

3.Must Article 11(1) of Regulation 833/2014 be interpreted as not precluding satisfaction of a claim if the claim concerns

(a)repayment of an advance payment in respect of goods which were never supplied on account of measures under the regulation?

(b)interest on a claim mentioned in (a)?

—

Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1).

—

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/535/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—