EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-130/19: Action brought on 15 February 2019 — European Court of Auditors v Karel Pinxten

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0130

62019CN0130

February 15, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.4.2019

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/24

(Case C-130/19)

(2019/C 148/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: C. Lesauvage, E. von Bardeleben, J. Vermer, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Karel Pinxten

Form of order sought

Declare that Mr Pinxten no longer meets the obligations arising from his office under Articles 285 and 286 TFEU and the rules adopted in application thereof;

Impose, consequently, the penalty laid down in Article 286(6) TFEU, the Court of Auditors leaving it to the discretion of the Court to determine the scope;

Order Mr Pinxten to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Court of Auditors complains that Mr Pinxten:

firstly, made improper use of the resources of the Court of Auditors in order to finance activities with no connection or incompatible with his duties as a Member;

secondly, made improper and unlawful use of tax privileges;

thirdly, made false insurance claims in the context of alleged accidents involving the service vehicle made available to him;

fourthly, exercised managed activities for a commercial company and intense political activity within a political party although he was in the service of the Court of Auditors;

fifthly, created a situation of conflict of interests by making a service offer to an official of an audited entity.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia