EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-570/18 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2018 by HF against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 29 June 2018 in Case T-218/17, HF v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0570

62018CN0570

September 10, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/20

(Case C-570/18 P)

(2018/C 455/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: HF (represented by: A. Tymen, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2018 in Case T-218/17,

Consequently,

uphold the form of order sought by the appellant at first instance and, thus,

annul the decision of the European Parliament of 30 June 2016 rejecting the appellant’s request for assistance,

order the Parliament to pay compensation in respect of non-financial harm estimated ex aequo et bono at EUR 90 000,

order the European Parliament to pay all of the costs incurred at first instance and on appeal.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Breach of the right to be heard — Breach of Article 41[(2)](a) of the Charter;

Breach of Article 41(1) of the Charter — Distortion of the arguments of the appellant — Breach by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons;

Breach of Article 31(1) of the Charter — Infringement of Article 12a(1), (3) and (24) of the Staff Regulations.

Furthermore, the appellant disputes the decision of the General Court to reject her claim for damages on the ground that the contested decision has not been set aside.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia