- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-19/06: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Mindo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Payment of the fine by the jointly and severally liable debtor — Applicant involved in an insolvency procedure in the course of the proceedings — No longer any interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TA0019
62006TA0019
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/15
(Case T-19/06)(1)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Payment of the fine by the jointly and severally liable debtor - Applicant involved in an insolvency procedure in the course of the proceedings - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 340/28
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Mindo Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: J. Folguera Crespo and P. Vidal Martínez, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by É. Gippini Fournier, N. Khan and F. Amato, and subsequently by É. Gippini Fournier, N. Khan and L. Malferrari, Agents)
Re:
Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 4012 final of 20 October 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.281/B.2 — Raw tobacco — Italy) and, in the alternative, application for a reduction in the fine imposed on Mindo Srl.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action;
2.Orders Mindo Srl to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.