- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-679/18: Action brought on 12 November 2018 — Showroom v EUIPO — E-Gab (SHOWROOM)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0679
62018TN0679
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.1.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 25/53
(Case T-679/18)
(2019/C 25/69)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Showroom sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by M. Janicka — Kapłon, legal adviser)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: E-Gab NV (Ternat, Belgium)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court/Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SHOWROOM — Application for registration No 11 110 376
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2019 in Case R 1834/2017-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and E-GAB (if the latter decides to intervene in the proceedings) to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant in the procedure before the Board of Appeal and before the Opposition Division of EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Union and of the Council.