- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-691/20: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2021 — Kühne v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Mobility regime — Request concerning the mobility obligation — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0691
62020TB0691
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 452/40
(Case T-691/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Mobility regime - Request concerning the mobility obligation - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 452/50)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Verena Kühne (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Schmechel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and B. Schäfer, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Parliament’s letter of 17 April 2020, supplemented on 21 April 2020, rejecting the applicant’s request concerning the application of the mobility rules.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible;
2.Ms. Verena Kühne shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.