- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-654/14: Action brought on 8 September 2014 — Revolution v OHIM (REVOLUTION)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0654
62014TN0654
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.11.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 388/21
(Case T-654/14)
2014/C 388/26
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Revolution LLC (Washington, United States) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 June 2014 given in Case R 2143/2013-1;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The work mark ‘REVOLUTION’ for services in Class 36 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 8 15 297
Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application for CTM registration
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of the Regulation No 207/2009