- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-413/17 INTP: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2018 — Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D) (Procedure — Interpretation of a judgment — EU trade mark — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0413
62017TB0413
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 436/50
(Case T-413/17 INTP) (*)
((Procedure - Interpretation of a judgment - EU trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 436/71)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Gruber and N. Siebertz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)
Re:
Application for interpretation of the judgment of 19 June 2018, Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D) (T-413/17, not published, EU:T:2018:356).
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interpretation.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(*)
OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.