EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-727/20 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – Kirimova v EUIPO (Internal market – Representation before EUIPO – Entry on the list of professional representatives – Refusal of the request – Requester who is not a national of a Member State of the EEA – Exemption from the nationality requirement – Article 120(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Concept of highly qualified professional – Principle of legal certainty – Right to be heard – Alteration – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0727

62020TA0727

September 25, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6644

11.11.2024

(Case T-727/20 RENV)

(Internal market - Representation before EUIPO - Entry on the list of professional representatives - Refusal of the request - Requester who is not a national of a Member State of the EEA - Exemption from the nationality requirement - Article 120(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Concept of highly qualified professional - Principle of legal certainty - Right to be heard - Alteration - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court)

(C/2024/6644)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nigar Kirimova (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Parassina and A. García López, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Re:

By her action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision No ER 93419-2020 of the Executive Director of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 September 2020 concerning the request for an exemption submitted by her pursuant to Article 120(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2017 L 154, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls Decision No ER 93419-2020 of the Executive Director of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 September 2020 concerning the request for an exemption submitted by Ms Nigar Kirimova pursuant to Article 120(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the General Court and before the Court of Justice.

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6644/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

*1 Language of the case: English.

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia