I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-675/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Tendering procedure - Aerial surveillance service - Remotely piloted aircraft system - Refusal to grant access - Application of the two main parties for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate - No discontinuance or withdrawal - Sound administration of justice - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 63/60)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Leonardo SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Esposito, F. Caccioppoli and G. Calamo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: H. Caniard, T. Knäbe and W. Szmidt, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of the decision of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) of 5 October 2020, by which it rejected the confirmatory application for access to documents submitted by the applicant under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Leonardo SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex).
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.