- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-136/20: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0136
62020TB0136
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.1.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/36
(Case T-136/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 24/48)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ardex GmbH (Witten, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lian Chen (Seseña Nuevo, Spain) (represented by: A. González López-Menchero and V. Valero Piña, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2019 (Case R 2503/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Ardex and Mr Chen.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ardex GmbH and Mr Lian Chen.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
* Language of the case: English.