I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
14.10.2024
(Case C-181/24,
Genmab)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Medicinal product for human use - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC) - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Conditions for granting - Article 3(d) - First marketing authorisation (MA) - Medicinal products containing the same active ingredient being granted several MAs - Withdrawal of the prior MA)
(C/2024/5965)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: Genmab A/S
Intervening party: Szellemi Tulajdon Nemzeti Hivatala
Article 3(d) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 must be interpreted as precluding the marketing authorisation submitted in support of an application for a supplementary protection certificate for a product from being regarded as the first marketing authorisation, within the meaning of that provision, if a prior marketing authorisation was granted for that same product but was withdrawn before the application for the supplementary protection certification was submitted.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5965/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—