- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-362/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — UI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance — Habitual residence — Place where the person’s main occupation is carried on — Five-year reference period)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0362
62019TA0362
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 28/40
(Case T-362/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance - Habitual residence - Place where the person’s main occupation is carried on - Five-year reference period)
(2021/C 28/61)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UI (represented by: J. Diaz Cordova, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 270 TFEU for (i) annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 27 August 2018 refusing to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance and (ii) compensation for the harm that the applicant claims to have suffered as a result.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders UI to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 305, 9.9.2019.