- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-234/24, Brose Prievidza: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 27 March 2024 – Brose Prievidza spol. v Director na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika Sofia
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0234
62024CN0234
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4308
15.7.2024
(Case C-234/24, Brose Prievidza)
(C/2024/4308)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: Brose Prievidza spol.
Respondent on a point of law: Director na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Sofia
Question referred
Does Directive 2008/9 confer a right to obtain a refund of value added tax paid which is claimed by the recipient of a supply of devices (tooling) where the subject of the supply has not left the territory of the supplier’s Member State and the supply of the tooling has been artificially split from the intra-Community supply, to the same recipient, of goods manufactured by means of those devices?
—
(1) Council Directive 2008/9/EC of 12 February 2008 laying down detailed rules for the refund of value added tax, provided for in Directive 2006/112/EC, to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund but established in another Member State (OJ 2008 L 44, p. 23).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4308/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—